- The review of apps that have only recently been updated.
- The review of apps that are too new to have many reviews.
- The review of content from your competitors.
- The review of content that you created or from which you receive money.
The correct answer is The review of content that you created or from which you receive money.
Here’s why:
- Conflict of Interest: Reviewing your own content or content that financially benefits you creates a conflict of interest. This can lead to biased reviews that don’t accurately reflect the app’s quality or user experience.
- Fairness and Transparency: Google Play aims to provide users with fair and unbiased reviews to help them make informed decisions. Allowing developers to review their own apps or financially benefit from reviews undermines this principle.
The other options are not necessarily violations of Google Play policies:
- Reviewing recently updated or new apps: While these apps might have fewer reviews, it’s not inherently against the rules to review them as long as the reviews are honest and unbiased.
- Reviewing competitors’ apps: Reviewing competitors’ apps is allowed, but the reviews must be objective and focus on the app’s features and functionality, not on promoting your own app or disparaging the competitor.
The main chapter where the reference to the correct answer can be found is “ Comply with Google Play store listing policies”. While the text doesn’t explicitly mention reviewing your own content, it emphasizes the importance of honest and transparent practices in the store listing, which includes providing accurate information and avoiding deceptive behavior. This implies that reviewing your own content would be a violation of these principles.